A political science professor says Canadians should not expect quick changes from the federal budget and warns that the way opposition leaders respond could shape how voters see them.

Mario Levesque of Mount Allison University in Sackville, New Brunswick, argues the plan is built around larger, long‑term projects that will take time to show results.

He points to investments in defence, infrastructure, and youth employment as examples of priorities designed to shape the country’s future rather than provide immediate relief.

“Overall, in one way, there are some pluses in this budget, but there are more bigger, long-term investments and less sexy as well,” Levesque said.

At the same time, Levesque notes the budget maintains major programs such as child care and dental care, which many families rely on.

He says those measures show the government is trying to balance immediate needs with longer‑term priorities.

He also weighed in on the political reaction. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre sharply criticized the budget, but Levesque says that approach may not connect with many Canadians.

“When you’re the opposition, you have to critique the government,” Levesque said.

“But you need a more balanced approach — say a couple of things are bad, these things over here are good. How can we improve on this for Canadians? Something like that would sell.”

He warns that a constant negative tone risks turning off voters outside Poilievre’s base.

For Levesque, the challenge for opposition leaders is to balance sharp attacks with constructive alternatives, while recognizing that Canadians are looking for stability in programs they depend on and patience with investments that take time to deliver.